![]() ![]() If you don't want to spend what the developer thinks is a fair price, use a paper and pencil and stop complaining. ![]() Larger companies could take a lesson from Dog Park's response to their customer's querries. Oprogramowanie do rejestrowania radia amatorskiego MacLoggerDX to fajna, próbna wersja oprogramowania Mac, naleca do kategorii Narzdzia. Regarding the price, there aree a lot more expensive programs out there that don't do half of what MLDX does. The link for the latest official version is available to download from the Dog Park site. If you aren't interested in "beta testing", don't download the beta. MacLoggerDX supports more than a hundred radios, automatically tuning to the spots you are interested in, swinging your beam around. It is because (in my opinion) the developer wants to get the new features and enhancements out to those who want them as fast as possible. One may wonder why there are so many "betas" released. The developer of the software is very responsive to any requests for new features or enhancements from users. It really is the Swiss Army Knife of ham software. It also works as a contest logging program using the Contest Helper window, and so much more. You can even use it to plot APRS packets. It tracks, WAS, WAZ, DXCC, VUCC and IOTA awards. MLDX aslo controls more than 50 different amateur and shortwave radios. It connects to DX clusters and displays spots as they are received, looks up calls on and QRZ.com (or CD). A zoom level determines how much of the world is visible on a map. It's a fantastic amateur radio logging program. MacLoggerDX has more features than can be listed here. 1 Answer Sorted by: 4 When you add a layer through one of the add functions, the layer will calculate the zoom level required to fit the whole of the data in the frame of the window. MacLoggerDX is one of the best ham radio logging programs out there, Mac or pc, period. After reading many of the previous reviews, I wonder how many of these people actually use the software and are amateur radio operators.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |